Recap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
199er Pairs Thursday Eve Session February 6, 2014
Scores after  5 rounds  Average:   37.5      Section E  North-South
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C
  1   47.51   35.63  A                             Richard Long - Carol Goldstone
  2   41.67   31.25  A                             Cordellia Scruggs - Arlene Schettler
  3   55.00   41.25  C   2                0.25(A)  Gayle Tomasetti - Rose Marie Sanders
  4   55.84   41.88  C   1     1     1    0.35(A)  Patricia Greason - Rebecca Sekse
  5   50.00   37.50  B                             Pat Fitzgibbons - Sue Gruskiewicz

199er Pairs Thursday Eve Session February 6, 2014
Scores after  5 rounds  Average:   37.5      Section E  East-West
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C
  1   64.00   48.00  C   1     1     1    0.35(A)  John Peterson - Richard Poznanski
  2   56.00   42.00  C                             Jeanne Theis - Philip Theis
  3   56.67   42.50  A   2                0.25(A)  Walt Pumo - Janice Pumo
  4   23.33   17.50  C                             Evelyn Reneer - Kathy Parkins

Board 1
North Deals
None Vul
8 5 4
A
J 6 4
J 9 8 7 3 2
Q 9
K Q J 8
A K 10 2
A K 4
N
WE
S
A 7
9 7 6 5 4 3
7 5
Q 6 5
6
22    6
6
K J 10 6 3 2
10 2
Q 9 8 3
10

E 5N; EW 4; W 1N; EW 2; NS 1; EW 1; Par −460

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW−31503.000.005-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
4 E54501.002.001-Long-Goldstone vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski
4 E54501.002.002-Scruggs-Schettler vs 3-Pumo-Pumo
4 E54501.002.004-Greason-Sekse vs 2-Theis-Theis

Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul
8 7
6 4 3 2
8 7 4 3
J 10 9
A 10 6 3
A 9 5
9 6
A K 4 2
N
WE
S
K 4 2
Q 10 8
K J 5
Q 8 7 3
1
15    11
13
Q J 9 5
K J 7
A Q 10 2
6 5

E 4N; W 3N; EW 3; E 4; EW 2; W 3; EW 1; Par −430

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW−1503.000.004-Greason-Sekse vs 2-Theis-Theis
2 NTW21202.001.005-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
4 E41301.002.002-Scruggs-Schettler vs 3-Pumo-Pumo
1 NTE41800.003.001-Long-Goldstone vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski

Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul
Q 3
A Q 10 6 5
7 5 4 2
10 6
K 10 9 4
J 2
A J 9
K Q 9 7
N
WE
S
J 8
K 8 7 4 3
K Q 8
5 4 2
8
14    9
9
A 7 6 5 2
9
10 6 3
A J 8 3

EW 2N; EW 2; EW 2; EW 1; EW 1; Par −120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 NTW−22003.000.005-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
3 W−11001.501.502-Scruggs-Schettler vs 3-Pumo-Pumo
1 NTE−11001.501.504-Greason-Sekse vs 2-Theis-Theis
1 NTE21200.003.001-Long-Goldstone vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski

Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul
A Q
A J 7
K Q 6 5
9 8 5 2
K J 10 9 2
10 5 3
8 2
K 4 3
N
WE
S
8 7 6 5
A 10 4 3
Q J 10 7 6
16
7    7
10
4 3
K Q 9 8 6 4 2
J 9 7
A

NS 6; NS 4N; NS 4; EW 2; EW 1; Par +1100: EW 6×−4

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6 N614303.000.004-Greason-Sekse vs 2-Theis-Theis
4 N66801.002.001-Long-Goldstone vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski
4 N66801.002.002-Scruggs-Schettler vs 3-Pumo-Pumo
4 S66801.002.005-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 4-Reneer-Parkins

Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul
A Q 8 7 6 5 2
K 7 2
6 2
2
K
10 9 5 4
K 8 5
K 9 8 7 6
N
WE
S
J 9 4
J 8 3
9 7 4
A Q J 10
9
9    9
13
10 3
A Q 6
A Q J 10 3
5 4 3

NS 4; NS 3; NS 1N; NS 1; EW 1; Par +620

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 N46203.000.005-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
3 N41702.001.001-Long-Goldstone vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski
3 S−11000.502.502-Scruggs-Schettler vs 3-Pumo-Pumo
5 S−11000.502.504-Greason-Sekse vs 2-Theis-Theis

Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul
8 7
J 9 5 4 2
K 10
Q 5 3 2
K 10 5 3
6 3
Q 8 5
A 9 8 7
N
WE
S
Q J 9 4 2
K 10 7
9 6 3 2
4
6
9    6
19
A 6
A Q 8
A J 7 4
K J 10 6

NS 5; NS 5; NS 2N; NS 3; EW 1; Par +450

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 N54502.500.503-Tomasetti-Sanders vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
4 N54502.500.505-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 3-Pumo-Pumo
2 NTS52101.002.004-Greason-Sekse vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski
2 S41300.003.002-Scruggs-Schettler vs 2-Theis-Theis

Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul
A 8 3 2
A 8 6
9 2
K Q 10 7
Q J 7 6 4
Q 10
6 5 3
6 3 2
N
WE
S
10 5
K 7 5 2
K Q J 4
A 9 5
13
5    13
9
K 9
J 9 4 3
A 10 8 7
J 8 4

S 3; NS 2N; N 2; S 2; NS 2; NS 1; N 1; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 W−22003.000.002-Scruggs-Schettler vs 2-Theis-Theis
1 S31402.001.004-Greason-Sekse vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski
1 N21101.002.003-Tomasetti-Sanders vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
1 NTN1900.003.005-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 3-Pumo-Pumo

Board 8
West Deals
None Vul
A J 10 6 5 2
9 8 4
9
10 8 7
K Q J 3
A 3 2
A J 6 4 3 2
N
WE
S
8
A 10 7 6
J 10 8 7 6 5 4
Q
5
15    7
13
K Q 9 7 4 3
5 2
K Q
K 9 5

EW 6; EW 6; EW 5; EW 1N; NS 1; Par −980

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 E−31502.500.503-Tomasetti-Sanders vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
5 W−31502.500.505-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 3-Pumo-Pumo
5 E64801.002.002-Scruggs-Schettler vs 2-Theis-Theis
6 ×E610900.003.004-Greason-Sekse vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski

Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul
Q J 9 6 4 3 2
5
A K
J 10 9
7
A K 8 6 3
J 8 5 4
Q 6 2
N
WE
S
A 8
J 9 2
10 9 6 3
A 8 5 3
11
10    9
10
K 10 5
Q 10 7 4
Q 7 2
K 7 4

NS 3; EW 2; EW 3; S 1N; EW 2; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 N44202.500.503-Tomasetti-Sanders vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
4 N44202.500.504-Greason-Sekse vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski
3 N41701.002.005-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 3-Pumo-Pumo
3 N31400.003.002-Scruggs-Schettler vs 2-Theis-Theis

Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul
A 7 6 3
K Q J 10 4 3
A K 10
J 10 8
A 9 7
9
Q 6 5 4 3 2
N
WE
S
K Q 10 8 6 5 2
A 8 5
J 9 7
17
7    10
6
K Q 9 5 4 2
J 4 3
7 6 2
8

N 6; NS 5; EW 4; S 5; EW 3; Par +500: EW 6×−2

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S66803.000.003-Tomasetti-Sanders vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
6 S−11001.501.504-Greason-Sekse vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski
5 S−11001.501.505-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 3-Pumo-Pumo
4 E56500.003.002-Scruggs-Schettler vs 2-Theis-Theis

Board 11
South Deals
None Vul
Q 7 2
10 8 7 4
K 7 2
K 6 5
9 6 4
J 5
A 10 6 5 4
9 8 4
N
WE
S
K J 10 5 3
Q 9 2
8
Q 10 7 3
8
5    8
19
A 8
A K 6 3
Q J 9 3
A J 2

N 4N; NS 4; S 2N; NS 3; N 3; NS 1; S 1; Par +430

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 N54502.500.501-Long-Goldstone vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
4 N54502.500.503-Tomasetti-Sanders vs 3-Pumo-Pumo
4 N44201.002.005-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 2-Theis-Theis
3 S31400.003.002-Scruggs-Schettler vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski

Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul
3 2
Q 8 6 4 3
J 10
10 8 6 5
5
K 5
K 8 5 2
A K J 7 4 2
N
WE
S
A K Q J 10 8 4
A 7 2
Q
Q 9
3
14    18
5
9 7 6
J 10 9
A 9 7 6 4 3
3

EW 6N; EW 6; EW 6; EW 2; EW 2; Par −990

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 E62303.000.001-Long-Goldstone vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
5 W64202.001.005-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 2-Theis-Theis
5 E75101.002.002-Scruggs-Schettler vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski
6 NTW710200.003.003-Tomasetti-Sanders vs 3-Pumo-Pumo

Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul
A 10 7 2
A Q 8
A K 5 3
9 4
5 4
7 3 2
10 7 2
Q J 10 7 3
N
WE
S
Q 3
K J 9 6 4
Q J 8 6
K 6
17
3    12
8
K J 9 8 6
10 5
9 4
A 8 5 2

NS 5; N 4N; S 3N; N 4; N 2; S 3; NS 2; S 1; Par +650

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 N56502.500.502-Scruggs-Schettler vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski
4 N56502.500.505-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 2-Theis-Theis
3 NTN46301.002.001-Long-Goldstone vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
4 S46200.003.003-Tomasetti-Sanders vs 3-Pumo-Pumo

Board 14
East Deals
None Vul
A Q J 6 3
K Q 10
K 10 7 6
2
10 8
5 4
Q 5 4 3
K Q 8 5 3
N
WE
S
K 7 4 2
J 8 6 2
A 2
9 6 4
15
7    8
10
9 5
A 9 7 3
J 9 8
A J 10 7

NS 4; NS 3N; NS 3; NS 3; NS 1; Par +420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 N54503.000.001-Long-Goldstone vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
2 N41701.501.503-Tomasetti-Sanders vs 3-Pumo-Pumo
2 S41701.501.505-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 2-Theis-Theis
3 NTN−1500.003.002-Scruggs-Schettler vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski

Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul
A 4
A Q J 10 8 6
K Q 2
A 5
K Q J 8 6 5
K 9 4 2
J 8 4
N
WE
S
10 9 7
7
7 6 5
9 8 7 4 3 2
20
10    0
10
3 2
5 3
A 10 9 3
K Q J 10 6

NS 7N; S 7; N 6; S 5; N 4; NS 5; S 1; Par +2220

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ×S59903.000.001-Long-Goldstone vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
4 N56501.501.502-Scruggs-Schettler vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski
4 N56501.501.503-Tomasetti-Sanders vs 3-Pumo-Pumo
4 ×W−23000.003.005-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 2-Theis-Theis

Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul
Q 2
7
A J 8 2
K Q J 10 5 4
7
A K Q 8 6 2
K 10 7
9 3 2
N
WE
S
A K J 10 8 6 5
9
9 4 3
A 8
13
12    12
3
9 4 3
J 10 5 4 3
Q 6 5
7 6

EW 5N; EW 4; EW 4; W 2; NS 2; E 1; Par −660

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 E−11002.500.501-Long-Goldstone vs 3-Pumo-Pumo
4 W−11002.500.504-Greason-Sekse vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
3 E31401.002.003-Tomasetti-Sanders vs 2-Theis-Theis
4 E66800.003.005-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski

Board 17
North Deals
None Vul
A 7 4
10 3
Q J 10 7 6 2
A 4
Q 9 8 5
J 8 7 4
5
Q J 6 2
N
WE
S
10 3 2
9 5
K 9 8 4 3
K 10 7
11
6    6
17
K J 6
A K Q 6 2
A
9 8 5 3

NS 4; NS 3N; NS 4; NS 2; NS 2; Par +420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 N54503.000.001-Long-Goldstone vs 3-Pumo-Pumo
4 S44202.001.005-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski
2 S31401.002.004-Greason-Sekse vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
3 N41300.003.003-Tomasetti-Sanders vs 2-Theis-Theis

Board 18
East Deals
N-S Vul
Q 10 8 6
10
J 9 7 6 5 2
J 8
K J 5 2
K J 5 3
A
7 6 4 2
N
WE
S
A 4 3
A 9 2
K Q 8
A Q 10 9
4
12    19
5
9 7
Q 8 7 6 4
10 4 3
K 5 3

EW 6; EW 5N; EW 5; EW 4; EW 2; Par −920

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTE34003.000.004-Greason-Sekse vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
3 NTE54601.501.501-Long-Goldstone vs 3-Pumo-Pumo
3 NTE54601.501.503-Tomasetti-Sanders vs 2-Theis-Theis
6 NTE69900.003.005-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski

Board 19
South Deals
E-W Vul
8 5
Q 10 5
A Q J 3
K 10 5 3
J 10 7
J 8 6 2
K 2
Q 6 4 2
N
WE
S
A K 6 4 3 2
7 3
10 8 5
J 9
12
7    8
13
Q 9
A K 9 4
9 7 6 4
A 8 7

NS 4N; NS 4; NS 4; NS 4; EW 1; Par +430

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTN44303.000.003-Tomasetti-Sanders vs 2-Theis-Theis
3 E−22002.001.004-Greason-Sekse vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
3 S41300.502.501-Long-Goldstone vs 3-Pumo-Pumo
4 S41300.502.505-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski

Board 20
West Deals
Both Vul
J 3 2
6 4 3
Q 10 9 2
K J 8
K 10 5
J 7 2
7 6 3
Q 7 6 3
N
WE
S
A 9
A K Q 9 8
J 5 4
10 5 4
7
6    14
13
Q 8 7 6 4
10 5
A K 8
A 9 2

NS 3; NS 2; EW 1; N 1; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 E−33003.000.003-Tomasetti-Sanders vs 2-Theis-Theis
3 E−22002.001.004-Greason-Sekse vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
2 S21101.002.005-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski
3 E−11000.003.001-Long-Goldstone vs 3-Pumo-Pumo

Board 21
North Deals
N-S Vul
K 9 3 2
Q 7 6
10 9 7
Q 9 3
10 8 5
9 5 2
K Q 8 6
A K 5
N
WE
S
Q 7 4
J 10 8 4
J 4 3
J 7 4
7
12    5
16
A J 6
A K 3
A 5 2
10 8 6 2

NS 3; NS 2N; NS 2; NS 2; NS 2; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTS21202.500.502-Scruggs-Schettler vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
2 NTS21202.500.503-Tomasetti-Sanders vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski
1 NTN1900.502.501-Long-Goldstone vs 2-Theis-Theis
1 NTS1900.502.504-Greason-Sekse vs 3-Pumo-Pumo

Board 22
East Deals
E-W Vul
4
A K 9 6 3
A 10
Q 8 7 6 2
A K 7 6
Q J 2
8 2
A J 10 5
N
WE
S
Q J 10 3
10 8 7 5
9 5 4 3
K
13
15    6
6
9 8 5 2
4
K Q J 7 6
9 4 3

EW 2; NS 1N; NS 2; NS 1; NS 1; Par −100: NS 2N×−1; NS 3×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 E−11002.500.502-Scruggs-Schettler vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
3 E−11002.500.503-Tomasetti-Sanders vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski
3 S−1501.002.004-Greason-Sekse vs 3-Pumo-Pumo
2 N−21000.003.001-Long-Goldstone vs 2-Theis-Theis

Board 23
South Deals
Both Vul
9 6
Q 10
K 10 9 8 5 4
A J 6
5
K 8 6 4 3
Q 3
7 5 4 3 2
N
WE
S
Q 8 3
A J 2
A J 7 6 2
Q 9
10
5    14
11
A K J 10 7 4 2
9 7 5
K 10 8

NS 4; N 2N; E 2; W 1; NS 1; EW 1; Par +620

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 S41703.000.004-Greason-Sekse vs 3-Pumo-Pumo
2 N31401.501.501-Long-Goldstone vs 2-Theis-Theis
2 S31401.501.502-Scruggs-Schettler vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
4 S−11000.003.003-Tomasetti-Sanders vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski

Board 24
West Deals
None Vul
10 9 5 2
8
7 5 4
Q 10 7 5 2
K Q 6
Q 9 6 2
K 8
J 9 8 4
N
WE
S
8 7 4
A 7 5 4
A Q 9 3
K 6
2
11    13
14
A J 3
K J 10 3
J 10 6 2
A 3

EW 2N; EW 2; E 2; EW 1; W 1; E 1; Par −120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 W−21002.500.502-Scruggs-Schettler vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
3 W−21002.500.504-Greason-Sekse vs 3-Pumo-Pumo
3 W−1500.502.501-Long-Goldstone vs 2-Theis-Theis
2 W−1500.502.503-Tomasetti-Sanders vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski

Board 25
North Deals
E-W Vul
8 5 2
5 4 3
K 7 3
K Q 9 8
A 3
J 10 9
J 10 9 8 6
J 4 2
N
WE
S
K Q 10 9 7 6
8
Q 2
10 6 5 3
8
7    7
18
J 4
A K Q 7 6 2
A 5 4
A 7

NS 4; NS 1N; NS 2; NS 2; Par +420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S44202.001.001-Long-Goldstone vs 2-Theis-Theis
4 S44202.001.002-Scruggs-Schettler vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
4 S44202.001.003-Tomasetti-Sanders vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski
3 S41700.003.004-Greason-Sekse vs 3-Pumo-Pumo