Recap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28  
199er Pairs Thursday Eve Session June 19, 2014
Scores after  6 rounds  Average:   60.0      Section E  North-South
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      Overall Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C     A     B     C
  1   32.92   39.50  C                                               Kathy Parkins - Theresa Raines
  2   55.92   67.10  B   2     2           3     3          0.77(OA) Arlene Schettler - Cordellia Scruggs
  3   50.08   60.10  A                                               Deanna Shuman - Lawrence Shuman
  4   54.67   65.60  B   3                 4     4          0.58(OA) Pat Fitzgibbons - Sue Gruskiewicz
  5   56.75   68.10  C   1     1     1     2     2     2    1.03(OA) James Connor - Duncan Wainwright
  6   53.42   64.10  C               2                 4    0.41(OC) Jim Bexfield - Robert Mukai
  7   46.08   55.30  C                                               James Worcester - Ping Ren

199er Pairs Thursday Eve Session June 19, 2014
Scores after  6 rounds  Average:   60.0      Section E  East-West
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      Overall Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C     A     B     C
  1   43.67   52.40  C                                               June Gladding - Betsy Deering
  2   40.00   48.00  C                                               Jeanne Theis - Philip Theis
  3   47.00   56.40  C                                               John Peterson - Richard Poznanski
  4   52.42   62.90  B   3                                  0.35(SA) Carol Goldstone - Jovica Medic
  5   50.75   60.90  A                                               Walt Pumo - Janice Pumo
  6   62.42   74.90  C   1     1     1     1     1     1    1.37(OA) James Sprung - Francesca Mazarella
  7   53.92   64.70  C   2     2     2     5           3    0.54(OC) Shiang Chen - Dewey Calderwood

Board 1
North Deals
None Vul
K J 6 5 3
A 5 3
J 8
Q J 3
Q 9 8 4
K 9 4 2
K 5 4 3
8
N
WE
S
A
Q 8 7
A Q 9 6
A K 10 7 5
12
8    19
1
10 7 2
J 10 6
10 7 2
9 6 4 2

EW 6; EW 5; EW 4N; EW 3; EW 4; Par −920

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 W−1505.000.001-Parkins-Raines vs 1-Gladding-Deering
3 E41304.001.003-Shuman-Shuman vs 5-Pumo-Pumo
3 W31403.002.006-Bexfield-Mukai vs 4-Goldstone-Medic
5 E64202.003.007-Worcester-Ren vs 6-Sprung-Mazarella
3 NTE44300.504.504-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 7-Chen-Calderwood
3 NTW44300.504.505-Connor-Wainwright vs 2-Theis-Theis

Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul
J 8 7 5 4 3 2
10
K
7 5 4 2
A 9
J 9 7
J 10 9 4 3
J 9 6
N
WE
S
K 10 6
A Q 2
Q 7 2
A Q 10 3
4
7    17
12
Q
K 8 6 5 4 3
A 8 6 5
K 8

EW 3N; EW 3; EW 2; Par −400

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTE41805.000.001-Parkins-Raines vs 1-Gladding-Deering
2 S−22004.001.003-Shuman-Shuman vs 5-Pumo-Pumo
3 S−33003.002.007-Worcester-Ren vs 6-Sprung-Mazarella
3 NTE34001.503.505-Connor-Wainwright vs 2-Theis-Theis
3 NTE34001.503.506-Bexfield-Mukai vs 4-Goldstone-Medic
3 NTE44300.005.004-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 7-Chen-Calderwood

Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul
A 10 9 6 5
J 8 4
K J 10
Q J
K J 2
A K Q 10 9 2
Q 8 6
9
N
WE
S
8 4 3
7
A 9 7 3
A 10 8 6 3
12
15    8
5
Q 7
6 5 3
5 4 2
K 7 5 4 2

EW 4; EW 3N; EW 2; EW 3; W 2; E 1; Par −620

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 W31404.001.004-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 7-Chen-Calderwood
2 W31404.001.006-Bexfield-Mukai vs 4-Goldstone-Medic
2 W31404.001.007-Worcester-Ren vs 6-Sprung-Mazarella
2 W41701.004.001-Parkins-Raines vs 1-Gladding-Deering
3 W41701.004.003-Shuman-Shuman vs 5-Pumo-Pumo
2 W41701.004.005-Connor-Wainwright vs 2-Theis-Theis

Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul
Q 5 4
7 4
A 3 2
A K 8 4 2
J 8 3
K Q 10 6 5 2
J 9
10 5
N
WE
S
A K 10 7 2
A 9
K Q 8 7 6
Q
13
7    18
2
9 6
J 8 3
10 5 4
J 9 7 6 3

EW 5; EW 5; EW 5; EW 1N; NS 1; Par −650

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 E46204.500.504-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 7-Chen-Calderwood
4 E46204.500.505-Connor-Wainwright vs 2-Theis-Theis
4 W56502.003.001-Parkins-Raines vs 1-Gladding-Deering
4 W56502.003.003-Shuman-Shuman vs 5-Pumo-Pumo
4 W56502.003.006-Bexfield-Mukai vs 4-Goldstone-Medic
5 ×N−38000.005.007-Worcester-Ren vs 6-Sprung-Mazarella

Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul
K 9 4 2
5 3
K J 10
K Q J 2
A 7
A K 4 2
A Q 8 6
A 6 4
N
WE
S
Q 6 5
J 9 8 7 6
4
10 9 8 5
13
21    3
3
J 10 8 3
Q 10
9 7 5 3 2
7 3

EW 5; W 4N; E 3N; EW 3; EW 1; EW 1; Par −450

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 W−21005.000.007-Worcester-Ren vs 5-Pumo-Pumo
2 NTW31504.001.002-Schettler-Scruggs vs 2-Theis-Theis
4 E44202.502.504-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 6-Sprung-Mazarella
4 E44202.502.505-Connor-Wainwright vs 1-Gladding-Deering
4 W54501.004.006-Bexfield-Mukai vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski
4 E64800.005.001-Parkins-Raines vs 7-Chen-Calderwood

Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul
A K 10
K Q 6 2
Q J 8
A 9 4
9 8 6 5
A 5 3
10 4
J 10 5 2
N
WE
S
Q 7
10 7 4
A 9 6 3 2
K 7 6
19
5    9
7
J 4 3 2
J 9 8
K 7 5
Q 8 3

NS 4N; NS 3; NS 3; NS 3; NS 2; Par +430

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTS44304.500.505-Connor-Wainwright vs 1-Gladding-Deering
3 NTS44304.500.506-Bexfield-Mukai vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski
4 N44203.002.007-Worcester-Ren vs 5-Pumo-Pumo
3 NTN34002.003.004-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 6-Sprung-Mazarella
2 S−1501.004.002-Schettler-Scruggs vs 2-Theis-Theis
3 NTN−21000.005.001-Parkins-Raines vs 7-Chen-Calderwood

Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul
A 7 6 4 2
A Q J 2
Q 9 2
K
K 8 3
K 9 5
A K J 8 5 3
5
N
WE
S
Q J
10 7 6
10 6 4
Q 9 8 6 3
16
14    5
5
10 9 5
8 4 3
7
A J 10 7 4 2

NS 3; NS 3; NS 3; W 1N; W 2; E 1; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 N41704.500.502-Schettler-Scruggs vs 2-Theis-Theis
2 N41704.500.506-Bexfield-Mukai vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski
2 N31402.502.501-Parkins-Raines vs 7-Chen-Calderwood
3 N31402.502.504-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 6-Sprung-Mazarella
3 W−11001.004.005-Connor-Wainwright vs 1-Gladding-Deering
2 NTN−22000.005.007-Worcester-Ren vs 5-Pumo-Pumo

Board 8
West Deals
None Vul
6
A Q J 10 6 4 2
K Q 7 4
10
10 8 7 3
7 5
A J 10 8 3
K 5
N
WE
S
A K 9 5 2
K 9 8
A Q 9 3 2
12
8    16
4
Q J 4
3
9 6 5 2
J 8 7 6 4

EW 5; EW 3N; EW 3; NS 1; EW 1; Par −450

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 E52005.000.007-Worcester-Ren vs 5-Pumo-Pumo
4 E54502.502.501-Parkins-Raines vs 7-Chen-Calderwood
4 E54502.502.502-Schettler-Scruggs vs 2-Theis-Theis
4 E54502.502.505-Connor-Wainwright vs 1-Gladding-Deering
4 E54502.502.506-Bexfield-Mukai vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski
5 ×N−48000.005.004-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 6-Sprung-Mazarella

Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul
A K 5 2
Q J 8 4
Q 9
A 10 5
Q 10 7
A 10 2
J 10 7 6 5 4
9
N
WE
S
9 8 6 4 3
K 5
A 8
K 7 3 2
16
7    10
7
J
9 7 6 3
K 3 2
Q J 8 6 4

NS 2; EW 2; NS 2; EW 1; Par +110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 N−1503.501.502-Schettler-Scruggs vs 1-Gladding-Deering
1 NTN−1503.501.503-Shuman-Shuman vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski
3 S−1503.501.505-Connor-Wainwright vs 7-Chen-Calderwood
3 N−1503.501.507-Worcester-Ren vs 4-Goldstone-Medic
4 N−21001.004.006-Bexfield-Mukai vs 2-Theis-Theis
2 E31400.005.001-Parkins-Raines vs 6-Sprung-Mazarella

Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul
K 10 9
J 9 5
A K J 7 5 2
3
A 2
Q 4 3 2
10 9 6
A J 10 2
N
WE
S
6 4 3
A 7 6
4
K Q 9 8 7 4
12
11    9
8
Q J 8 7 5
K 10 8
Q 8 3
6 5

EW 4; NS 2; EW 2; NS 3; EW 1N; Par −130

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 E−33005.000.005-Connor-Wainwright vs 7-Chen-Calderwood
3 N41303.002.002-Schettler-Scruggs vs 1-Gladding-Deering
4 N41303.002.006-Bexfield-Mukai vs 2-Theis-Theis
4 N41303.002.007-Worcester-Ren vs 4-Goldstone-Medic
2 W21101.004.001-Parkins-Raines vs 6-Sprung-Mazarella
4 E41300.005.003-Shuman-Shuman vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski

Board 11
South Deals
None Vul
Q 3
6 3
A J 5 4 3
9 7 6 2
A 9 8 5 2
Q J 7 5
Q 8
Q 4
N
WE
S
J 7
A 10 9 8 4 2
9 2
J 10 3
7
11    6
16
K 10 6 4
K
K 10 7 6
A K 8 5

NS 4; NS 4; EW 2; NS 1; Par +130

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 N51505.000.006-Bexfield-Mukai vs 2-Theis-Theis
2 S41303.002.001-Parkins-Raines vs 6-Sprung-Mazarella
3 S41303.002.002-Schettler-Scruggs vs 1-Gladding-Deering
2 S41303.002.003-Shuman-Shuman vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski
3 E−1500.504.505-Connor-Wainwright vs 7-Chen-Calderwood
4 E−1500.504.507-Worcester-Ren vs 4-Goldstone-Medic

Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul
K 10 5 2
A
A Q 8 6
J 7 5 3
A Q 9 6 3
Q 9 3
10 4
K 4 2
N
WE
S
J 8
K 10 8 7 6
K 9 5 3
A 9
14
11    11
4
7 4
J 5 4 2
J 7 2
Q 10 8 6

EW 3; EW 3; EW 2N; NS 2; W 1; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 E−31505.000.006-Bexfield-Mukai vs 2-Theis-Theis
4 E−1504.001.003-Shuman-Shuman vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski
1 W1803.002.002-Schettler-Scruggs vs 1-Gladding-Deering
2 E21101.503.505-Connor-Wainwright vs 7-Chen-Calderwood
2 E21101.503.507-Worcester-Ren vs 4-Goldstone-Medic
2 E31400.005.001-Parkins-Raines vs 6-Sprung-Mazarella

Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul
9 7 2
9 2
A Q 6 4
A K 6 3
6 4
A K 10 7 4 3
K J 8 7
7
N
WE
S
K Q 10 3
Q J 5
9 5 2
Q 10 8
13
11    10
6
A J 8 5
8 6
10 3
J 9 5 4 2

EW 2; NS 3; EW 1N; NS 1; EW 1; Par +110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 W−11005.000.002-Schettler-Scruggs vs 7-Chen-Calderwood
3 W31402.003.001-Parkins-Raines vs 5-Pumo-Pumo
3 W31402.003.003-Shuman-Shuman vs 2-Theis-Theis
3 W31402.003.004-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 4-Goldstone-Medic
3 W31402.003.006-Bexfield-Mukai vs 1-Gladding-Deering
2 W31402.003.007-Worcester-Ren vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski

Board 14
East Deals
None Vul
K J
A K 4
Q 9 4 2
J 10 7 3
9 8 7 3
J 10 9 6 3
K 8 3
Q
N
WE
S
Q 10 5 4
Q 7 2
10 5
K 8 5 4
14
6    7
13
A 6 2
8 5
A J 7 6
A 9 6 2

N 4N; S 3N; NS 5; NS 5; NS 1; NS 1; Par +430

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTN44304.001.003-Shuman-Shuman vs 2-Theis-Theis
3 NTN44304.001.004-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 4-Goldstone-Medic
3 NTN44304.001.006-Bexfield-Mukai vs 1-Gladding-Deering
3 S61702.003.002-Schettler-Scruggs vs 7-Chen-Calderwood
3 N41301.004.001-Parkins-Raines vs 5-Pumo-Pumo
5 S−21000.005.007-Worcester-Ren vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski

Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul
A 9 6
9 8 7
K 7 6
9 7 4 2
J 10 8 5 2
6
10 5 4 3 2
J 8
N
WE
S
7
A K Q 10 5 4 2
A 9 8
5 3
7
2    13
18
K Q 4 3
J 3
Q J
A K Q 10 6

NS 4; NS 2; EW 2; EW 1; Par +130

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 E−1504.001.002-Schettler-Scruggs vs 7-Chen-Calderwood
3 E−1504.001.004-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 4-Goldstone-Medic
4 E−1504.001.007-Worcester-Ren vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski
4 S−11002.003.003-Shuman-Shuman vs 2-Theis-Theis
3 E41701.004.001-Parkins-Raines vs 5-Pumo-Pumo
5 S−22000.005.006-Bexfield-Mukai vs 1-Gladding-Deering

Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul
A 10 9 2
6 4 2
Q J 10 5
3 2
J 6
Q 9
A K 7 6 4
Q 10 8 4
N
WE
S
K 8 5 4
A J 10 5 3
2
J 7 5
7
12    9
12
Q 7 3
K 8 7
9 8 3
A K 9 6

EW 2; EW 1N; EW 2; NS 1; EW 1; Par −100: NS 2×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW−11005.000.003-Shuman-Shuman vs 2-Theis-Theis
1 NTN−1504.001.006-Bexfield-Mukai vs 1-Gladding-Deering
2 NTE21203.002.002-Schettler-Scruggs vs 7-Chen-Calderwood
3 E31401.503.501-Parkins-Raines vs 5-Pumo-Pumo
2 E31401.503.504-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 4-Goldstone-Medic
3 NTE36000.005.007-Worcester-Ren vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski

Board 17
North Deals
None Vul
K Q
7
Q 9 8 6 5 4
J 8 6 4
10 8 7 4 3
A K
A K 2
A 10 3
N
WE
S
A 9 6 2
Q 6 5 2
J 3
K 5 2
8
18    10
4
J 5
J 10 9 8 4 3
10 7
Q 9 7

EW 6; EW 5N; EW 2; W 3; E 2; EW 1; Par −980

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 E21105.000.007-Worcester-Ren vs 2-Theis-Theis
4 W54504.001.002-Schettler-Scruggs vs 6-Sprung-Mazarella
4 W64801.503.501-Parkins-Raines vs 4-Goldstone-Medic
4 W64801.503.503-Shuman-Shuman vs 1-Gladding-Deering
4 E64801.503.504-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski
4 W64801.503.505-Connor-Wainwright vs 5-Pumo-Pumo

Board 18
East Deals
N-S Vul
K
2
A Q 10 9 8 7
K Q 5 4 3
A J 8 4 3
A J 9 3
J 5 4
8
N
WE
S
7 5
Q 10 8 7 5
6
J 9 7 6 2
14
11    3
12
Q 10 9 6 2
K 6 4
K 3 2
A 10

S 5N; NS 5; EW 2; S 3; N 1N; N 2; Par +660

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTS46304.500.504-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski
3 NTS46304.500.505-Connor-Wainwright vs 5-Pumo-Pumo
2 N51502.502.502-Schettler-Scruggs vs 6-Sprung-Mazarella
2 N51502.502.507-Worcester-Ren vs 2-Theis-Theis
3 W−21001.004.001-Parkins-Raines vs 4-Goldstone-Medic
5 N−11000.005.003-Shuman-Shuman vs 1-Gladding-Deering

Board 19
South Deals
E-W Vul
Q 10 8 6 2
A 7 3
K 5 3
K 5
A 7 5
9 4 2
A Q 8 6
Q 9 4
N
WE
S
K Q J 10
J 10 4 2
A 10 7 3 2
12
12    11
5
K J 9 4 3
8 6 5
9 7
J 8 6

W 4; E 3; EW 4; W 4; E 3; EW 1N; NS 1; Par −500: NS 4×−3

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 W−11004.001.002-Schettler-Scruggs vs 6-Sprung-Mazarella
3 W−11004.001.003-Shuman-Shuman vs 1-Gladding-Deering
2 W−11004.001.005-Connor-Wainwright vs 5-Pumo-Pumo
4 E41301.503.504-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski
4 W41301.503.507-Worcester-Ren vs 2-Theis-Theis
4 W51500.005.001-Parkins-Raines vs 4-Goldstone-Medic

Board 20
West Deals
Both Vul
J 3 2
K 2
A Q 8 5 3
10 7 2
10 5
A 8 7 6 4 3
9 2
K J 9
N
WE
S
Q 6
Q 10 5
K 7
A Q 8 6 4 3
10
8    13
9
A K 9 8 7 4
J 9
J 10 6 4
5

NS 4; EW 3; NS 4; EW 3; Par +500: EW 5×−2; EW 5×−2

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 S41704.500.503-Shuman-Shuman vs 1-Gladding-Deering
3 S41704.500.504-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski
4 W−11002.003.001-Parkins-Raines vs 4-Goldstone-Medic
4 W−11002.003.005-Connor-Wainwright vs 5-Pumo-Pumo
4 E−11002.003.007-Worcester-Ren vs 2-Theis-Theis
3 W31400.005.002-Schettler-Scruggs vs 6-Sprung-Mazarella

Board 21
North Deals
N-S Vul
K 3 2
Q 10
A 10 6 5
K J 10 9
8 6 4
K 9
J 9 8
Q 8 7 4 3
N
WE
S
J 10 9 5
A J 2
K Q 7 4
6 5
13
6    11
10
A Q 7
8 7 6 5 4 3
3 2
A 2

NS 4; NS 1N; NS 2; NS 1; NS 1; Par +620

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S56505.000.004-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 2-Theis-Theis
3 S41704.001.003-Shuman-Shuman vs 7-Chen-Calderwood
2 NTN31503.002.005-Connor-Wainwright vs 4-Goldstone-Medic
2 S31401.503.501-Parkins-Raines vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski
2 S31401.503.502-Schettler-Scruggs vs 5-Pumo-Pumo
1 NTW−1500.005.006-Bexfield-Mukai vs 6-Sprung-Mazarella

Board 22
East Deals
E-W Vul
Q 8 7
K 8 7
10 6 5 2
K 10 9
K 5 2
J 9 3 2
9 8 4 3
8 2
N
WE
S
A 6 4
Q 6 5
A K 7
A J 6 4
8
4    18
10
J 10 9 3
A 10 4
Q J
Q 7 5 3

EW 2; EW 2; NS 1; Par −110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 NTE−22005.000.006-Bexfield-Mukai vs 6-Sprung-Mazarella
3 NTE−11003.002.002-Schettler-Scruggs vs 5-Pumo-Pumo
1 E−11003.002.004-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 2-Theis-Theis
1 E−11003.002.005-Connor-Wainwright vs 4-Goldstone-Medic
2 NTE21201.004.001-Parkins-Raines vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski
1 NTE31500.005.003-Shuman-Shuman vs 7-Chen-Calderwood

Board 23
South Deals
Both Vul
4 2
9 2
J 10 5
A K J 7 5 4
K J 8
A K J 10 8
A 8
Q 9 2
N
WE
S
Q 6 5
Q 7 6 4
K Q 9 7 6
3
9
18    9
4
A 10 9 7 3
5 3
4 3 2
10 8 6

EW 5; EW 5; EW 2; NS 1; Par −650

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 W56503.002.001-Parkins-Raines vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski
4 W56503.002.002-Schettler-Scruggs vs 5-Pumo-Pumo
4 W56503.002.004-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 2-Theis-Theis
4 W56503.002.005-Connor-Wainwright vs 4-Goldstone-Medic
4 W56503.002.006-Bexfield-Mukai vs 6-Sprung-Mazarella
4 W66800.005.003-Shuman-Shuman vs 7-Chen-Calderwood

Board 24
West Deals
None Vul
7
Q 10 7 2
6 3 2
K 8 7 4 3
4
A 8 5 3
K Q J 10 4
Q 5 2
N
WE
S
A K J 10 8 6
9 6
7
A 10 9 6
5
12    12
11
Q 9 5 3 2
K J 4
A 9 8 5
J

EW 2N; EW 2; EW 2; EW 3; EW 2; Par −120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 E−21005.000.003-Shuman-Shuman vs 7-Chen-Calderwood
4 E−1503.501.504-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 2-Theis-Theis
4 E−1503.501.505-Connor-Wainwright vs 4-Goldstone-Medic
3 E41702.003.001-Parkins-Raines vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski
3 NTW34001.004.002-Schettler-Scruggs vs 5-Pumo-Pumo
4 E44200.005.006-Bexfield-Mukai vs 6-Sprung-Mazarella

Board 25
North Deals
E-W Vul
2
A K Q J 7
A J 9 7
Q 10 6
6
10 9
Q 6 5 4 3 2
A J 7 2
N
WE
S
10 9 8
6 5 4 2
K 8
K 8 5 3
17
7    6
10
A K Q J 7 5 4 3
8 3
10
9 4

NS 5N; NS 5; NS 3; NS 1; NS 1; Par +460

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6 S710105.000.005-Connor-Wainwright vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski
4 S75103.501.502-Schettler-Scruggs vs 4-Goldstone-Medic
5 S75103.501.507-Worcester-Ren vs 7-Chen-Calderwood
4 S54501.503.503-Shuman-Shuman vs 6-Sprung-Mazarella
4 S54501.503.506-Bexfield-Mukai vs 5-Pumo-Pumo
6 S−1500.005.004-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 1-Gladding-Deering

Board 26
East Deals
Both Vul
9 8 6 4 3
4 2
K 8 6 2
7 2
A K 7 5 2
J 10 5 3
5 4
9 3
N
WE
S
J 10
A K
A Q 9 7
A Q 6 5 4
3
8    20
9
Q
Q 9 8 7 6
J 10 3
K J 10 8

EW 4; EW 3N; EW 3; EW 4; EW 2; Par −620

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTE−11004.500.504-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 1-Gladding-Deering
3 NTW−11004.500.506-Bexfield-Mukai vs 5-Pumo-Pumo
3 NTE36002.003.002-Schettler-Scruggs vs 4-Goldstone-Medic
3 NTW36002.003.003-Shuman-Shuman vs 6-Sprung-Mazarella
3 NTE36002.003.005-Connor-Wainwright vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski
3 NTW46300.005.007-Worcester-Ren vs 7-Chen-Calderwood

Board 27
South Deals
None Vul
10 3 2
Q
Q J 10 9 7 5
Q J 6
J 8 6
J 9 6 4 2
A K 8 6
8
N
WE
S
A 9 7 4
10 8 7
4 3 2
9 5 4
8
9    4
19
K Q 5
A K 5 3
A K 10 7 3 2

NS 6; NS 4N; NS 2; NS 2; NS 3; Par +920

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTN64905.000.005-Connor-Wainwright vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski
3 NTS54604.001.004-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 1-Gladding-Deering
3 NTS44303.002.003-Shuman-Shuman vs 6-Sprung-Mazarella
5 S54002.003.007-Worcester-Ren vs 7-Chen-Calderwood
3 S41301.004.002-Schettler-Scruggs vs 4-Goldstone-Medic
6 S−21000.005.006-Bexfield-Mukai vs 5-Pumo-Pumo

Board 28
West Deals
N-S Vul
K 5
Q J 10 6 5
10 5 2
J 10 3
Q 10 9
K 7
A K 8 4
K 9 7 6
N
WE
S
A 7 6 3
8 4
9 7 6
A Q 5 2
7
15    10
8
J 8 4 2
A 9 3 2
Q J 3
8 4

EW 3; EW 4; EW 4; EW 2N; EW 1; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW−1503.101.902-Schettler-Scruggs vs 4-Goldstone-Medic
3 NTW−1503.101.904-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 1-Gladding-Deering
3 NTW−1503.101.905-Connor-Wainwright vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski
3 NTW−1503.101.906-Bexfield-Mukai vs 5-Pumo-Pumo
3 NTW34000.104.903-Shuman-Shuman vs 6-Sprung-Mazarella